Uganda Cancer Finance Pilot
MVP demonstration and Operating Model Explorer
See how healthcare services, evidence review and simulated payment controls connect. Explore what people, resources and institutional decisions are needed for an operational cervical screening service.
Demonstration only · Financial activity is simulated. No live funds move.
Go to access formTwo connected resources, one access point
Walk through the MVP demonstration
Follow sample cases in cervical screening, breast screening and oncology nurse training. See how service records, evidence review, costs and controls affect progress toward a simulated payment instruction.
Explore the proposed operating model
Explore cervical screening roles, participant handoffs, positive-screening follow-up and referrals, funding arrangements and institutional requirements. Identify what must be agreed and built for an operating service.
The Explorer is part of this MVP environment. It describes proposed operating arrangements; inclusion in the Explorer does not mean a capability is already implemented or institutionally approved.
How to review
- Walk through a pathway. Observe what the demonstration shows and where progress is blocked.
- Explore the operating requirements. Consider your institution’s responsibilities, patient continuity and decisions still needed.
- Submit observations. Use the review links inside the MVP or Explorer. Identify the page or handoff, what you observed and what you recommend.
Returning reviewers can go directly to the Explorer after signing in. Something not demonstrated is a question to investigate, not proof that it is missing. Do not include patient-identifying information in review submissions.
Why this matters and how the demonstration works
Why this MVP matters
Turning value into verified health impact
Many diaspora families, global allies, philanthropies, and institutional partners want to support healthcare in Africa. Yet they often face the same problem: money can move while authorization, delivery, documentation, evidence, and accountability remain uncertain.
Traditional remittance and modern financial technology can make cross-border value movement easier. Healthcare financing requires a further question:
What must be true before value can responsibly become payment and verified health impact?
GLOHBX is rail-agnostic.
The proposed operational design would connect to approved payment and funding services, subject to assessment and agreement, while establishing the governed pathway that connects sponsor intent to authorized care, verified service delivery, accepted proof, disciplined costing, and controlled payment-readiness.
What the MVP Demonstrates
The Uganda MVP demonstrates an evidence-to-financing control chain:
The MVP evaluates each stage from governed case facts. A downstream instruction cannot create, replace, or bypass authorization, redemption, evidence, reviewer acceptance, or accepted-only closeout.
What You Will See
Governed care authorization
A restricted care right connects an approved sponsor, beneficiary, service, and provider.
Accepted service-event proof
The service event is captured, evidenced, and reviewed before it can enter accepted-only closeout.
Learning and cost intelligence
The accepted event generates structured implementation observations and a provisional cost per accepted event, including comparison with an illustrative demonstration ceiling—not fiscal approval.
Shadow payment-readiness
The MVP evaluates service, evidence, costing, provider, approval, and simulated custody controls before generating a non-executable provider payment instruction.
What still needs agreement before live operations
Case Readiness Is Not Pathway Readiness
A controlled event may satisfy the rules for accepted-only closeout and shadow payment-readiness. That does not mean the wider health-service pathway is ready for live activation or scale.
Readiness acceptance, permission to receive funds and permission to pay providers require separate decisions. Individual payments still require accepted evidence and applicable approvals.
Repeated cases, validated costing, stable evidence quality, provider capacity, governance, custody and payment controls, operational continuity, and partner approvals are still required.
The labels below illustrate the distinction; they do not report the pilot’s current approval status.
Illustrative case status
Shadow Payment Ready
Illustrative pathway status
Readiness Building
Partner Review Lens
As you review the MVP, consider which readiness gate your institution could help strengthen:
Every partner should strengthen a readiness gate before strengthening the story.
Institutional Roles
Global Health Catalyst
Global Health Catalyst is the platform operator and proof-before-payment architecture lead. It supports the digital workflow, verification logic, implementation learning, partner coordination, and financing-readiness pathway.
Uganda Cancer Institute
Uganda Cancer Institute is the clinical, operational, and co-design anchor for service rules, standard operating procedures, evidence requirements, costing validation, accepted-only closeout, and future activation-readiness gates.
Simulation boundaries and abbreviations
This MVP uses simulated sponsor value and controlled demonstration data.
It may display
- Provisional accepted-event costs
- An illustrative demonstration ceiling—not fiscal approval
- Simulated custody references
- Simulated rail references
- A non-executable provider payment instruction
It does not
- Move live money
- Display or transfer a live custodian balance
- Complete a remittance
- Execute a payment rail
- Settle a provider
- Create a government outcome-payment obligation
Acronyms used in this MVP
GLOHBX — Global Health Bond Exchange
GHC — Global Health Catalyst
UCI — Uganda Cancer Institute
© 2026 GLOHBX. Limited-access stakeholder demonstration.